Regarding dimension out-of romantic jealousy, on the 40 care about-statement products https://datingmentor.org/ecuadorian-dating/ had been said because creation of the fresh Thinking-Report and Projective Jealousy Balances (Bringle, Roach, Andler, & Evenbeck, 1979). Of a lot tool were used only if. , 1992) designed to determine gender variations; the latest Multidimensional Envy Measure (Pfeiffer & Wong, 1989) made to assess the three proportions of jealousy (cognitive, emotional and you will behavioral proportions); the new Twitter Jealousy Measure (Muise, Christofides, & Des) intended for comparing the possibilities of an event which causes thinking away from envy participants pertaining to their hobby to your Myspace; the fresh Envy Level (Buunk, 1997), accustomed have a look at around three kind of jealousy (reactive, stressed and precautionary) and Social Envy Scale (IJS; Mathes, & Severa 1981), and therefore assesses this new bad feelings due to genuine or endangered losses out-of a liked person to a competitor.
For the Brazil, the newest Romantic Envy Inventory try revised (Bueno & Carvalho, 2012) In terms of Colombia, there aren’t any psychometric studies away from a particular level towards the intimate envy
Regarding the Latin-american perspective, you will find a version when you look at the Chile of the List of Practices of your own Pair That can cause Jealousy (Fernandez, Pavez, & Dufey, 2014). In Mexico, a great Multidimensional Way of measuring Jealousy (Diaz-Enjoying, Rivera, & Flores, 1989) has been elaborated and you can a primary studies is actually carried out with the Multidimensional Catalog off Romantic Jealousy (Mota, Gonzalez-Arratia, Valdez, Gonzalez, & Hernandez, 2016). Additionally, earlier in the day training failed to manage Factorial Confirmatory Investigation (CFA) to validate brand new grounds design discovered, and you will low reliability levels were included in its things (Bueno & Carvalho, 2012) otherwise brief trials were used (Mota ainsi que al., 2016).
The IJS put up to own Mathes and you will Severa (1981) is one of the most put scales to possess evaluating intimate envy, it found half dozen factors you to definitely gauge the sensitiveness to help you dangers related to: (a) Partner’s unfaithfulness and you will dating anybody else (items step one, 3, 12, 14, 15, sixteen, 20, twenty-two, 23, and you may twenty five); (b) Partner’s prominence (situations 2, step 3, cuatro, eight, ten, 13, 17, 20, and you may 23); (c) A keen untrustworthy partner (affairs 1, 4, 6, 19, and you will 21); (d) Partner’s old schedules (factors eleven, twenty four, 26, twenty-seven, and you can twenty-eight); (e) Partner’s indifference (products 8, 9 and you will twenty four); and you can (f) Lover’s remaining household members having old schedules and you can gender differences (factors 5 and you may 18).
All the tools mentioned above have demostrated enough quantities of legitimacy and reliability
Discover five education that have checked out regarding the reliability and you can validity. Mathes and you will Severa (1981) expose several degree, and the first study did the development of your own size having 39 activities, which had been shorter to help you 28 affairs just after mathematical studies. Then, inside a second investigation, IJS was utilized alongside other scales you to examined close love-hyperlinks, insecurity, self-value and you can an ad hoc survey away from separate identities, guaranteeing, centered on theory, the advanced away from jealousy, the higher the amount of Close like and cheaper the new independent label of pair. Inside studies, we report a coefficient of accuracy of .92 towards the overall measure. During the a third research, Mathes, Phillips, Skowran and Cock (1982), to offer this new signs out of legitimacy, utilized the IJS and two behavioural procedures: (a) possibilities whenever confronted by a competition and you will (b) words regarding possessiveness for the companion, thanks to a call which they made to the person who took part in the analysis. The newest requested correlations were received, hence again supported this new legitimacy of your scale. Finally, for the a fourth research, Mathes, Roter and you will Joerger (1982) corroborated the brand new convergent authenticity regarding IJS with other balances you to evaluated personal envy.
No responses yet