Jevons, Meters. P., and you will Parker, Yards. T. (1964). J. din. Path., 17, 243-250. Lidwell, 0. Meters. (1959). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth., 18,49-52. Real time, I., and Nichols, An excellent. C. (1961).J. inject. Dis.,108, 195-204. Macdonald, A great. (1946). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth., 5, 230-233. Meyer, W. (1966). Zentbl. Bukt. PurusitKde., I . Abt. Orig., 201,465-481. Meyer, W. (1967). J. Hyg., Camb., 65,439-447. escort Modesto Nakagawa, M. (1960). Jap. J. damp. Res., 8, 331-342. Oeding, P., and Williams, R. E. 0. (1958). step three. Hyg., Cumb., 56, 445-454. Pagano, J. S., Farrer, S. Meters., Plotkin, S. A., Brachman, P. S., Fekety, F. R., and you may Pidcoe, V. (1960). Research, Letter.Y., 131, 927-928. Parker, M. T. (1966). Inside “Brand new Scientific Base out-of Medicine Yearly Remark” (J. P. Ross, ed.), pp. 157-173. College from London, The fresh Athlone Force, London area. Parker, M. T., Todinson, Good. J. H., and you will Williams, Roentgen. Age. 0. (1955). J. Hyg., Cumb., 53,458-473.
The fresh new parasexual cycle and its particular include in genetic data
Pether, J. V. S. (1968).J. Hyg., C a great d . , 66,605. Poole, P. M., and you can Baker, J. Roentgen. (1966). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth., 25, 116-123. Declaration (1959). Int. Bull. bact. Nomencl.,nine, 115-118. Statement (1963). Int. Bull. bact. Nomencl., thirteen, 119-122. Report (1967). Int. Bull. buct. Nomencl., 17, 113-125. Report (1971). Int. Bull. syst. Buct., 21, 165, 167, 171. Rountree, P. Yards. (1959). J. gen. Microbiol., 20,620-633. Rountree, P. Yards., and you may Asheshov, E. H. (1961). J. gen. Microbiol., 26, 111-122. Rountree, P. Meters., and you can Freeman, B. M. (1955). Med. J. Aust., 2, 157-161. Ruys, An effective. C., and you may Borst, J. (1959). Antonie wan Leeuwenhoek, twenty-five, 237-240. Seto, J. T., and you may Wilson, J. B. (1958). In the morning.step three. wet. Res., 19, 241-246. Smith, H. W. (1948a).J. Hyg., C you d . , 46,7681. Smith, H. W. (1948b);Jp. Street. Ther., 58, 179-188. Smith, H. W. (1954).J. Road. Buc
Tarr, H. An excellent. (1958). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth., 17, 64-72. A. (1965). Veterinarian. Rec., 77, 477-480. Wentworth, B., Romig, W. Roentgen., and you may Dixon, W. J. (1964). J. contaminate. Dis.,114, 179188.
Williams, Roentgen. E. 0. (1957). Zentbl. Bakt. PurasitKde., We . Abt. Orig., 168, 528-532. Williams, Roentgen. Elizabeth. O., and you will Jevons, M. P. (1961). Zentbl. Bukt. ParasitKde., We Abt. Orig., 181,349-358. Williams, Roentgen. Age. O., and you may Rippon, J. E. (1952). J. Hyg., Camb., 50, 320-353. Williams, Roentgen. Elizabeth. O., Rippon, J. Age., and Dowsett, L. M. (1953). Lancet, i, 510-514. Wilson, G. S., and you may Atkinson, J. D. (1945). Lancet, i, 647-649.
Hereditary Research inside the Small-bacteria DAVID An effective. HOPWOOD John Znnes Institute, Norwikh, The united kingdomt I. Addition . 11. Segregation just like the Evidence of Simple Hereditary Control . A. The newest genetic approach to biology . B. The new identification out of segregation . 111. The basis out of Genetic Mapping . B. The fresh new sequencing off loci to your a linkage chart: multi-factor crosses C. Linkagegroups . D. Genetic great-framework . E. Removal mapping . IV. Useful Hereditary Assessment . An effective. Dominance screening . Bplementation examination . C. Epistasis . V. Hereditary Investigation inside the Eukaryotic Microbes . Good. General factors . step 1. 2. Tetrad investigation . B. Hereditary research specifically bacteria step 1. Aspergillus nidulans . . dos. Aspergillus niger or other “imperfect” fungus step 3. Neurospora crassa . 4. Almost every other ascomycetes . 5. Yeasts . 6. Filamentous basidiomycetes . eight. Ustilago . 8. Chlamydomonas reinhardii . nine. Ciliates . ten. Slime moulds VI. Hereditary Data from inside the Prokaryotes . An excellent. Standard considerations . 1. Virility items and you will conjugational mapping . 2. Transduction and co-transduction . step 3. Conversion and co-conversion cuatro. Non-choosy data .
fifty 51 57 61 61 65 66 69 69 73 75 77 78 80 81 81 83 84 91 94
Watson, W
Genetic study particularly bacteria step one. Escherichia coli, Salmonella typhimurium or any other Enteric germs . 2. Pseudomonas aeruginosa and you may Ps. putida . step 3. Bacillus subtilis 4. Streptmyces coelicolor or any other actinomycetes . 5. Almost every other bacteria C. Official mapping procedures separate out-of recombination VII. Hereditary Studies in Worms A good. Standard considerations . step one. Type of viral genomes dos. Great features of malware family genes B. Genetic analysis in particular worms step 1. Bacteriophages 2. Creature viruses step 3. Bush viruses VIII. Finishing Remarks References .
Нет Ответов